This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
A continuation method is used to study Rayleigh–Bénard convection in a non-Newtonian fluid inside a parallelepiped cavity. The cavity has its length equal to twice the side of the square cross-section. Shear-thinning and shear-thickening Carreau fluids are considered. The focus is put on the two stable branches which exist in the Newtonian case, a stable primary branch of transverse rolls B₁ and a primary branch of longitudinal roll B₂ , stabilized beyond a secondary bifurcation point S₂ . Although the primary bifurcation points are unchanged, the non-Newtonian properties strongly modify the bifurcation diagram. Indeed, for a shear-thinning fluid, the stable solutions can exist at much smaller Rayleigh numbers Ra , on subcritical branches beyond saddle-node points SN₁ and SN₂ , and small perturbations can be sufficient to reach them. In agreement with Bouteraa et al. ( J. Fluid Mech. , vol. 767, 2015, pp. 696–734), the change of the primary bifurcations from supercritical to subcritical occurs at given values of what they define as the degree of shear-thinning parameter α . Moreover, the value of the Rayleigh number at the saddle-node points can be approximated by a simple expression, as proposed by Jenny et al. ( J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. , vol. 219, 2015, pp. 19–34). In the case of a shear-thickening fluid, the branches remain supercritical, but the secondary point S₂ is strongly moved towards larger Ra , making it more difficult to reach the longitudinal roll solution. Energy analyses at the bifurcations SN₁ , SN₂ and S₂ show that the changes of the corresponding critical thresholds Rac are connected with the changes of the viscous properties, but also with changes of the buoyancy effect.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henry et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: