Patterns in the Development of Self-Analytic Groups

This study first presents convergences and controversies in current theories and empirical findings on the phases of development of self-study groups. Hypotheses about sequence of phases are derived and tested by contentanalyzing interaction in three groups that met over four-month periods. The findings show that the groups went through similar phases of development. The data are interpreted as indicating that the groups begin in a state of anomie. Through testing, conflict, and negotiation they develop a relatively cohesive workgroup with consensus on values, goals, and norms. The affirmation and articulation of the groups' emergent culture is followed by a period of stable work until interrupted by pressure of separation and disintegration of the group.