Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have studied the thermodynamically significant low-energy conformations of 200 random 24-residue model proteins on a square lattice with the Rosenbluth and Rosenbluth (1955) chain growth algorithm combined with multilink additions and Boltzmann weighting. We use a model proposed by Dill (1985) that represents the protein as a connected sequence of hydrophobic and hydrophilic beads on the lattice with nearest-neighbor interactions between the constituent beads. Two interaction sets were investigated—attraction between just the hydrophobic beads and attraction between hydrophobic residues and also between hydrophilic residues. The distribution of energies found with attraction only between hydrophobic beads is broad and consistent with the previous results of Lau and Dill (1989). However, the low-energy states are highly degenerate and noncompact. When attraction between hydrophilic beads is included with the attraction between hydrophobic beads, the energy distribution is sharp. Also, the low-energy configurations are reasonably nondegenerate and compact. This indicates that even with this simple model, important characteristics of the low-energy states of the model proteins are sensitive to the details of the interaction set used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
O’Toole et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: