Key result
Eteplirsen treatment for 240 weeks maintained cardiac and upper limb function in two nonambulatory patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, with outcomes and dystrophin production similar to 10 ambulatory patients.
Why the study?
The study aimed to describe the outcomes of two nonambulatory patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy who participated in two clinical studies of eteplirsen.
Does long-term treatment with eteplirsen maintain cardiac, pulmonary, and upper limb function in nonambulatory patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy?
Observational (n=12)
Open-label
Does long-term treatment with eteplirsen maintain cardiac, pulmonary, and upper limb function in nonambulatory patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy?
Long-term eteplirsen treatment may help maintain cardiac and upper limb function in nonambulatory patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Suggests maintained function with eteplirsen in nonambulatory DMD; leaves open confirmation in controlled trials.
This analysis aims to describe the outcomes of two nonambulatory patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) who participated in two clinical studies. The two consecutive trials of eteplirsen (studies 201 and 202) were conducted in patients with DMD (N = 12) and confirmed genetic mutations amenable to exon 51 skipping.In study 201, 12 patients were randomized to receive once-weekly, double-blind intravenous infusions of eteplirsen 30 or 50 mg/kg or placebo for 24 weeks; patients then received open-label eteplirsen during weeks 25 through 28. All 12 patients continued onto open-label extension study 202 and received long-term treatment with eteplirsen. We compared cardiac, pulmonary, and upper limb function and dystrophin production in the nonambulatory twin patients versus the 10 ambulatory patients through 240 combined treatment weeks.Ten study patients remained ambulatory through both studies, while the identical twin patients both experienced early, rapid loss of ambulation. The twin patients had greater disease severity at baseline (6-minute walk test [6MWT], 330 and 256 m) versus the other patients (n = 10; 6MWT range, 341-418 m). They maintained cardiac and upper limb function through combined week 240, with outcomes similar to those of the patients who remained ambulatory. Dystrophin production was confirmed following eteplirsen treatment.Despite the loss of ambulation, other markers of disease progression remained relatively stable in the eteplirsen-treated twin patients and were similar to those of the ambulatory patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfano et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (n=12). Eteplirsen vs. Untreated controls (for dystrophin) and ambulatory patients was evaluated on Percent dystrophin-positive fibers (PDPF) at week 180 (MD 32.3, p=<0.001). Eteplirsen treatment for 240 weeks maintained cardiac and upper limb function in two nonambulatory patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy, with outcomes and dystrophin production similar to 10 ambulatory patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: