Key result
Prior CABG in patients with suspected AMI was associated with significantly lower diagnostic accuracy of integrated clinical judgement compared to no prior CABG (AUC 0.80 vs 0.87; P=0.004).
Why the study?
Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction can be challenging in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting.
Does the diagnostic accuracy of chest pain characteristics and ECG for acute myocardial infarction differ in patients with prior CABG compared to those without?
Population
4015 patients presenting to the ED with suspected AMI (plus validation cohort n = 13 653)
Comparison
Prior CABG vs no prior CABG
Design
Prospective diagnostic cohort study with independent external validation
Authors
Loading...
Lower diagnostic accuracy of clinical judgement after CABG warrants cautious AMI interpretation; this cohort study leaves open whether routine early angiography improves outcomes.
Cohort (n=4,015)
Does the diagnostic accuracy of chest pain characteristics and ECG for acute myocardial infarction differ in patients with prior CABG compared to those without?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.8% vs 0.87%
p-value: p=0.004
Patients with prior CABG presenting with suspected AMI have a higher prevalence of AMI and unstable angina but lower diagnostic accuracy from chest pain characteristics and ECG, supporting the liberal use of early coronary angiography.
Koechlin et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Suspected acute myocardial infarction (n=4,015). Prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. No prior CABG was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy of integrated clinical judgement (Area Under the Curve) (p=0.004). Prior CABG in patients with suspected AMI was associated with significantly lower diagnostic accuracy of integrated clinical judgement compared to no prior CABG (AUC 0.80 vs 0.87; P=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: