Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 1, 2009Journal of Applied PsychologyOpen Access

Strong claims and weak evidence: Reassessing the predictive validity of the IAT.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

HBHart BlantonMitchell InstituteJJJames JaccardNew York UniversityJKJonathan KlickCalifornia University of Pennsylvania

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Blanton et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a85745ad06b31cc19d0bf63https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014665
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Releasing the Beast: A Study of Compliance with Orders to Use Race as a Selection Criterion1995 · 80 citations
  2. 2The Law of Implicit Bias2006 · 81 citations
  3. 3Ten Difference Score Myths2001 · 691 citations
  4. 4Do Frequency Representations Eliminate Conjunction Effects? An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration2001 · 455 citations