Key result
Patients with femoroacetabular impingement had significantly decreased flexion, internal rotation, and abduction in comparison to normal hips (p < 0.001).
Why the study?
Does the HipMotion CT-based method accurately assess hip range of motion and identify differences between normal hips and those with femoroacetabular impingement?
Population
150 patients with normal hip range of motion and 31 consecutive hips with femoroacetabular impingement…
Comparison
CT-based method for noninvasive… vs Normal hips (for the clinical comparison cohort)
Design
Other
Authors
Loading...
May support HipMotion CT analysis for FAI ROM assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Observational (n=181)
Does the HipMotion CT-based method accurately assess hip range of motion and identify differences between normal hips and those with femoroacetabular impingement?
p-value: p=<0.001
The HipMotion CT-based method provides an accurate and reliable 3D assessment of hip range of motion, successfully quantifying functional deficits in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.
Tannast et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (n=181). Femoroacetabular impingement vs. Normal hips was evaluated on Hip range of motion (flexion, internal rotation, and abduction) (p=<0.001). Patients with femoroacetabular impingement had significantly decreased flexion, internal rotation, and abduction in comparison to normal hips (p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: