Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have used density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT to investigate the geometric and electronic structure and the optical properties of the phosphorescent platinum compounds: Pt(II) (2-(4',6'-difluorophenyl)pyridinato-N,C(2)')(2,4-pentanedionato-O,O) (FPt1) and Pt(II) (2-(4',6'-difluorophenyl)pyridinato-N,C(2)')(1,3-propanedionato-O,O) (FPt0). We first examined isolated compounds (monomers) and evaluated their photophysical properties at the ground-state and lowest triplet excited-state (T(1)) geometries; the characteristics of the S(0) --> T(1) transitions are nearly identical in both compounds. Dimers of FPt0 and of FPt1 were then studied in order to shed light, at least qualitatively, on the respective role of Pt-Pt bimetallic interactions and interligand pi-pi interactions in the formation of excimer structures. While the Pt-Pt interactions are critical for excimer formation, the interligand pi-pi interactions also play a significant role in determining the optimal excimer geometry and the magnitude of the phosphorescence energy lowering in going from the monomer to the aggregated dimer. The distorted cofacial-type excimer structures found for FPt1, with a Pt-Pt distance around 2.9 A and interligand distances around 3.5-3.8 A, lead to phosphorescence energy lowerings with respect to the monomer on the order of 0.7-0.96 eV, in very good agreement with experiment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: