Key result
Diagnosing AVNRT with a bystander concealed nodoventricular pathway requires identifying an accessory pathway resetting the AVNRT and excluding orthodromic reentrant tachycardia via a normal AP.
Why the study?
Diagnosing AVNRT with a bystander concealed nodoventricular pathway requires electrophysiological steps to identify accessory pathways and exclude orthodromic reentrant tachycardia.
Para-Hisian pacing and His-refractory premature ventricular contractions are key electrophysiological maneuvers for diagnosing AVNRT with a bystander concealed nodoventricular pathway.
Hypothesis-generating for concealed NVP in refractory AVNRT; leaves open diagnostic standardization and prevalence.
The occurrence of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with a bystander concealed nodoventricular pathway (NVP) has been reported.1–3 Diagnosing these complicated cases requires some electrophysiological steps.4 First, the presence of an accessory pathway (AP) resetting the AVNRT immediately after delivery of a His-refractory premature ventricular contraction should be identified. Second, orthodromic reentrant tachycardia via a normal AP, known as the bundle of Kent, should be excluded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamashita et al. (2025) studied Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) with a bystander concealed nodoventricular pathway (NVP). Para-Hisian pacing and His-refractory premature ventricular contraction was evaluated. Diagnosing AVNRT with a bystander concealed nodoventricular pathway requires identifying an accessory pathway resetting the AVNRT and excluding orthodromic reentrant tachycardia via a normal AP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: