Key result
Apixaban and rivaroxaban showed no significant differences in 180-day risks of all-cause mortality (5.08% vs 4.60%; ARD -0.48%), recurrent VTE, or hospitalized bleeding in patients with VTE.
Why the study?
Does apixaban compared to rivaroxaban reduce mortality, recurrent VTE, or bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism?
Population
8,187 patients with venous thromboembolism in Denmark. Apixaban group: median age 70, 50% male. Rivaroxaban…
Comparison
Apixaban vs Rivaroxaban
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
180 days
Authors
Loading...
Comparable VTE outcomes observed with apixaban and rivaroxaban; leaves open confirmation by randomized trials.
Cohort (n=8,187)
Yes
Does apixaban compared to rivaroxaban reduce mortality, recurrent VTE, or bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism?
Absolute Risk Reduction: -0.48 (95% CI -1.49–0.72)
Absolute Event Rate: 5.08% vs 4.6%
Absolute Risk Reduction: -0.48%
In a nationwide cohort of VTE patients, apixaban and rivaroxaban showed similar safety and effectiveness profiles at 180 days.
Sindet‐Pedersen et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in venous thromboembolism (n=8,187). Apixaban vs. Rivaroxaban was evaluated on all-cause mortality (absolute risk difference -0.48%, 95% CI -1.49 to 0.72). Apixaban and rivaroxaban showed no significant differences in 180-day risks of all-cause mortality (5.08% vs 4.60%; ARD -0.48%), recurrent VTE, or hospitalized bleeding in patients with VTE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: