Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: MRI FLAIR signal serves as a time surrogate in unknown onset strokes; however, its prognostic value in early known-onset strokes treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) remains unclear. We aim to evaluate whether FLAIR positivity predicts hemorrhagic transformation and less favorable functional outcome following IVT within 4.5 h of symptom onset. Methods: A systematic search of Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library was conducted. We included studies reporting 90-day functional outcome and hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous thrombolysis within 4.5 h of symptom onset in relation to the FLAIR signal on pre-treatment MRI. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed bias using QUIPS. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023486781). Results: Six studies comprising 951 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients with FLAIR-positive lesions (25.86%) had non-significantly higher odds of hemorrhagic transformation (OR, 3.47; 95% CI, 0.51–23.57; p = 0.131) and significantly higher odds of unfavorable 90-day outcome (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.01–4.55; p = 0.049). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of FLAIR status for predicting hemorrhagic transformation were 41.2% and 82.1%. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of FLAIR status for predicting less favorable outcome were 40.9% and 78.1%, respectively. Conclusions: FLAIR positivity is significantly associated with less favorable 90-day functional outcome and a trend toward a higher rate of hemorrhagic transformation following IVT within 4.5 h of symptom onset. It may aid risk stratification but should not preclude treatment in eligible patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhubi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: