Key result
Between 2008 and 2015, the incidence of apixaban and rivaroxaban use increased while dabigatran use decreased among 186,405 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation across 6 European countries.
Why the study?
To estimate the incidence of direct oral anticoagulant drug use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and describe user and treatment characteristics across 6 European countries.
Observational (n=186,405)
Yes
DOAC use, particularly apixaban and rivaroxaban, increased across 6 European countries from 2008 to 2015, with significant regional variability in patient characteristics and dosing practices.
Shifting DOAC preferences in European AF warrant surveillance; leaves open drivers of regional variability and outcome effects.
AIMS: To estimate the incidence of direct oral anticoagulant drug (DOAC) use in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and to describe user and treatment characteristics in 8 European healthcare databases representing 6 European countries. METHODS: Longitudinal drug utilization study from January 2008 to December 2015. A common protocol approach was applied. Annual period incidences and direct standardisation by age and sex were performed. Dose adjustment related to change in age and by renal function as well as concomitant use of potentially interacting drugs were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 186 405 new DOAC users (age ≥18 years) were identified. Standardized incidences varied from 1.93-2.60 and 0.11-8.71 users/10 000 (2011-2015) for dabigatran and rivaroxaban, respectively, and from 0.01-8.12 users/10 000 (2012-2015) for apixaban. In 2015, the DOAC incidence ranged from 9 to 28/10 000 inhabitants in SIDIAP (Spain) and DNR (Denmark) respectively. There were differences in population coverage among the databases. Only 1 database includes the total reference population (DNR) while others are considered a population representative sample (CPRD, BIFAP, SIDIAP, EGB, Mondriaan). They also varied in the type of drug data source (administrative, clinical). Dose adjustment ranged from 4.6% in BIFAP (Spain) to 15.6% in EGB (France). Concomitant use of interacting drugs varied between 16.4% (SIDIAP) and 70.5% (EGB). Cardiovascular comorbidities ranged from 25.4% in Mondriaan (The Netherlands) to 82.9% in AOK Nordwest (Germany). CONCLUSION: Overall, apixaban and rivaroxaban increased its use during the study period while dabigatran decreased. There was variability in patient characteristics such as comorbidities, potentially interacting drugs and dose adjustment. (EMA/2015/27/PH).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibáñez et al. (2019) conducted an observational in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=186,405). Direct oral anticoagulant drugs (DOACs) was evaluated on Incidence of direct oral anticoagulant drug (DOAC) use. Between 2008 and 2015, the incidence of apixaban and rivaroxaban use increased while dabigatran use decreased among 186,405 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation across 6 European countries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: