Why the study?
Does exercise induce appropriate hemodynamic adjustments in patients with implanted permanent pacemakers and fixed heart rates, and does increasing the pacing rate improve these adjustments?
Does exercise induce appropriate hemodynamic adjustments in patients with implanted permanent pacemakers and fixed heart rates, and does increasing the pacing rate improve these adjustments?
Patients with fixed-rate pacemakers can maintain appropriate hemodynamic adjustments during exercise, though a higher pacing rate may provide slight additional benefits.
Supports exercise hemodynamics with fixed-rate pacemakers; extends observations but leaves open rate-adaptive benefits in RCTs.
Hemodynamic changes similar to normal healthy subjects were observed in patients with implanted permanent pacemaker and fixed heart rate during the sustaincd hand-grip and bicycle ergometer exercise.The sustained hand-grip exercise caused a slight but significant elevation of blood pressure as well as a slight but significant prolongation of left ventricular ejection time (LVET), while the cardiac index remained unchanged.On the other hand, during ergometer exercise, the blood pressure, cardiac index and LVET were markedly increased, while the pre-ejection period (PEP), PEP/LVET, isovolumetric contraction time and total peripheral resistance were significantly decreased. So far as the pacing rate is concerned, the increment in cardiac index was slightly augumented and the recovery time of the hemodynamic changes following the exercise was shortened when the pacing rate was increased from 70 to 100, although the differences were not very marked.The present results indicate that the hemodynamic adjustments to the exercise are appropriately maintained even in the patients with artificial pacemaker and fixed heart rate. The results also suggest that a higher pacing rate than in rutine use may be more appropriate for the exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
OSAMU YAMANE (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: