Water-free care in Dutch intensive care unit patient rooms: impact on Gram-negative bacteria detections in routine patient care

This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.

BACKGROUND: Patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are at an increased risk of healthcare-associated infections with Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), for which sinks in patient rooms are known reservoirs. We investigated the association between water-free care practices and the incidence of GNB detections in Dutch ICUs in non-outbreak settings. METHODS: We performed a retrospective ecological study (2018-2022) using data from the Infectious diseases Surveillance Information System-Antibiotic Resistance (ISIS-AR), the National Intensive Care Evaluation registry and a questionnaire on water-free care. Detections (colonisation and infections) of seven bacteria groups (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., all Enterobacterales, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales [ESBL-E] and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales) were analysed at ICU-year level. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated for water-free vs. non-water-free ICUs, adjusted for ICU and patient characteristics. FINDINGS: Data from 37 ICUs were analysed, 22 ICU-years in the water-free group and 131 in the non-water-free group. Water-free ICUs were larger, with more surgery admissions and mechanically ventilated patients. For all bacteria, adjusted IRRs were close to 1 with broad 95% confidence intervals (CIs), ranging from 0.82 (95% CI: 0.44-1.52) for ESBL-E to 1.39 (95% CI: 0.69-2.84) for Acinetobacter spp. Sensitivity analyses showed similar results. CONCLUSION: Although positive effects of water-free care on GNB detection rates have been described in single ICUs, these findings were not reflected in this Dutch multi-centre study. Possible explanations are low infection prevalence, high prevention standards, widespread usage of selective decontamination and insufficient power to detect small differences. Evidence for benefits of water-free care in non-outbreak settings remains limited, highlighting the importance of future research in different ICU settings.