Key result
Left atrial ejection force increases in early stages of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction but drops significantly below normal values in grade III dysfunction (p<0.0001).
Cross-Sectional (n=150)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Left atrial ejection force initially increases as a compensatory mechanism in mild-to-moderate LV diastolic dysfunction but markedly fails in severe (grade III) diastolic dysfunction.
Hypothesis-generating for tracking diastolic dysfunction severity; should not change practice without prospective validation.
Assessment of Left Atrial Ejection Force in Patients with different Grades of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction Objective: To assess left atrial ejection force (LAEF) in patients with different grades of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction compared to traditional Doppler and tissue Doppler measurements. Methods: 120 patients enrolled into four equal groups (n=30), each group represented a different grade of LV diastolic dysfunction and 30 subjects with normal diastolic function. We assessed echocardiographic measurements of dimensions and diastolic function, LA volume index (LAVI), and LAEF and age-corrected %LAEF. Results: In comparison to control subjects, the study group had more diabetic and hypertensive patients, increased all LV dimensions, estimated LVEDP (p<0.0001), LAVI (p<0.0001), LAEF and %LAEF (p<0.0001). On comparing different grades of diastolic dysfunction, patients with worse grades of diastolic dysfunction were older, more hypertensive and diabetic. They had larger LV dimensions, estimated LVEDP (p<0.0001), and LAVI (p<0.0001). LAEF and %LAEF showed an increase from grade I (8.84 ± 3.09 Kdynes, 188.93 ± 40.12%) to Ia (10.66 ± 3.10 Kdynes, 239.7 ± 72.45%) to II (11.82 ± 45.9 Kdynes, 256.57 ± 45.92%) then demonstrated a significant reduction in grade III to 2.77 ± 1.71 Kdynes, 57.88 ± 32.49% (p<0.0001) dropping below normal values seen in the control subjects (4.98 ± 1.72 Kdynes, 93.30 ± 9.31%) (p<0.0001). Linear regression analysis showed factors affecting %LAEF were: age, E-wave velocity, average e’ velocity, E/A ratio and E/e’ ratio. Conclusions: LAEF is generally increased in patients with LV diastolic dysfunction compared to those with normal diastolic function. Patients in grade III diastolic dysfunction show marked impairment of LAEF dropping below those with normal diastolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmed El Missiri (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction (n=150). Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction vs. Normal diastolic function was evaluated on Left atrial ejection force (LAEF) (p=<0.0001). Left atrial ejection force increases in early stages of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction but drops significantly below normal values in grade III dysfunction (p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: