Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article, we propose a procedure for selecting a random-sized subset that includes all experimental treatments that are superior to the control treatment. The comparison is based on two binary endpoints. An experimental treatment is deemed superior if it demonstrates higher success probabilities than the control on both endpoints. While responses across different treatments are assumed to be independent, responses within the same treatment may exhibit dependence. To model this within-treatment association, we use the odds ratio and employ the bivariate binomial distribution to compute the probability of a correct selection. We derive design parameters for three scenarios: (1) independent endpoints, (2) dependent endpoints with known association, and (3) dependent endpoints with unknown association. For each case, we provide tables indicating the minimum sample size required to satisfy the specified probability criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: