Why the study?
Does bedtime insulin combined with daytime glipizide improve glycemic control in NIDDM patients with sulfonylurea failure?
Does bedtime insulin combined with daytime glipizide improve glycemic control in NIDDM patients with sulfonylurea failure?
Bedtime insulin combined with daytime glipizide is superior to either therapy alone for improving glycemic control in NIDDM patients who have failed sulfonylurea monotherapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports bedtime insulin plus daytime glipizide over monotherapy for glycemic control in sulfonylurea failure; extends RCT evidence for combination regimens in type 2 diabetes.
Bedtime insulin (BI)/daytime sulfonylurea (DSU) therapy was studied double-blind in 30 non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus subjects in whom sulfonylurea (SU) therapy had failed. Subjects were switched to glipizide for 2 months (phase I) to confirm failure (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 12.0 ± 0.4 mmol/1) and then randomly assigned into three groups: BI-DSU; BI-no DSU; and DSU-no BI. During phase II (3 months), the BI dose was fixed (20 U/1.73 m2, low-dose). In phase III (3 months), BI was titrated up (high-dose) to achieve good control or until hypoglycemie symptoms prevented further dose increases. In phase IV (6 months), 25 of the 30 original subjects received open-labeled, high-dose BI-DSU. Low-dose BI-DSU markedly reduced FPG (13.6 ± 0.8 to 8.0 ± 0.6 mmol/1, P < 0.001), mean 24-h glucose (P < 0.001), HbA1c (8.9 ± 0.7 to 7.6 ± 0.3%, P = 0.07), and basal hepatic glucose production (HGP) (P < 0.005). A positive correlation (r = 0.69, P < 0.05) between the declines in FPG and HGP was observed. Neither low-dose BI alone nor DSU alone reduced FPG, mean 24-h glucose, HbA1c, or basal HGP. High-dose (40 ± 5 U/day) BI plus DSU further reduced the FPG (6.3 ± 0.6 mmoM), HbA1c (7.1 ± 0.3%), mean 24-h plasma glucose, and basal HGP (all P < 0.05 vs. phase II). High-dose BI alone (38 ± 4 U/day) improved FPG (P < 0.01 vs. phase II), mean 24-h plasma glucose (P < 0.005 vs. phase II), HbA1c (P < 0.05 vs. phase II), and basal HGP (P < 0.05 vs. phase I) to a degree similar to low-dose BI-DSU but less than high-dose BI-DSU. Regardless of prior treatment, FPG and HbA1c were controlled during phase IV. Weight gain during BI-DSU was largely attributable to reduced glucosuria. In conclusion, 1) both BI-DSU and BI alone improve glycemia in SU failure patients; 2) BI-DSU is superior to BI alone during both low- and high-dose BI; 3) the efficacy of BI is related to its suppression of basal HGP; and 4) good long-term glycemie control (up to 12 months) can be achieved with combined BI-DSU therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
shank et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: