B-50/GAP-43 binds to actin filaments but does not directly alter actin polymerization or filament organization.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
B-50 binds F-actin without direct regulatory effects in vitro; leaves open its role in neuronal cytoskeletal dynamics in vivo.
To investigate a possible function of the nervous tissue-specific protein kinase C substrate B-50/GAP-43 in regulation of the dynamics of the submembranous cytoskeleton, we studied the interaction between purified B-50 and actin. Both the phosphorylated and dephosphorylated forms of B-50 cosedimented with filamentous actin (F-actin) in a Ca(2+)-independent manner. Neither B-50 nor phospho-B-50 had any effect on the kinetics of actin polymerization and on the critical concentration at steady state, as measured using pyrenylated actin. Light scattering of F-actin samples was not increased in the presence of B-50, suggesting that B-50 does not bundle actin filaments. The number of actin filaments, determined by [3H]cytochalasin B binding, was not affected by either phospho- or dephospho-B-50, indicating that B-50 has neither a severing nor a capping effect. These observations were confirmed by electron microscopic evaluation of negatively stained F-actin samples, which did not reveal any structural changes in the actin meshwork on addition of B-50. We conclude that B-50 is an actin-binding protein that does not directly affect actin dynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hens et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: