Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
AI can automatically measure CAC from CTAC, but its ability to derive additional cardiac anatomic features and their prognostic utility remained to be evaluated.
Does AI-based derivation of cardiac anatomy from CT attenuation correction images improve risk stratification for MACEs in patients undergoing hybrid myocardial perfusion imaging?
Cohort (n=7,613)
Yes
Does AI-based derivation of cardiac anatomy from CT attenuation correction images improve risk stratification for MACEs in patients undergoing hybrid myocardial perfusion imaging?
Effect estimate: HR 1.46 to 3.31
AI can automatically derive cardiac chamber volumes and LV mass from CT attenuation imaging, significantly improving cardiovascular risk assessment for hybrid perfusion imaging.
May enhance MACE risk stratification beyond CAC in hybrid MPI; hypothesis-generating and leaves open impact on management.
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography attenuation correction (CTAC) improves perfusion quantification of hybrid myocardial perfusion imaging by correcting for attenuation artifacts. Artificial intelligence (AI) can automatically measure coronary artery calcium (CAC) from CTAC to improve risk prediction but could potentially derive additional anatomic features. OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated AI-based derivation of cardiac anatomy from CTAC and assessed its added prognostic utility. METHODS: The authors considered consecutive patients without known coronary artery disease who underwent single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (CT) myocardial perfusion imaging at 3 separate centers. Previously validated AI models were used to segment CAC and cardiac structures (left atrium, left ventricle, right atrium, right ventricular volume, and left ventricular [LV] mass) from CTAC. They evaluated associations with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), which included death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or revascularization. RESULTS: In total, 7,613 patients were included with a median age of 64 years. During a median follow-up of 2.4 years (IQR: 1.3-3.4 years), MACEs occurred in 1,045 (13.7%) patients. Fully automated AI processing took an average of 6.2 ± 0.2 seconds for CAC and 15.8 ± 3.2 seconds for cardiac volumes and LV mass. Patients in the highest quartile of LV mass and left atrium, LV, right atrium, and right ventricular volume were at significantly increased risk of MACEs compared to patients in the lowest quartile, with HR ranging from 1.46 to 3.31. The addition of all CT-based volumes and CT-based LV mass improved the continuous net reclassification index by 23.1%. CONCLUSIONS: AI can automatically derive LV mass and cardiac chamber volumes from CT attenuation imaging, significantly improving cardiovascular risk assessment for hybrid perfusion imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miller et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in No known coronary artery disease (n=7,613). Highest quartile of AI-derived LV mass and cardiac chamber volumes vs. Lowest quartile of AI-derived LV mass and cardiac chamber volumes was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or revascularization) (HR 1.46 to 3.31).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: