Key result
Orthopedics, neurosurgery, and ophthalmology were associated with 3.9, 2.3, and 2.3 times greater adjusted likelihoods of preoperative medical consultation compared to general surgery, respectively.
Why the study?
What are the predictors of preoperative medical consultation among privately insured surgical patients?
Cohort (n=7,400)
Yes
What are the predictors of preoperative medical consultation among privately insured surgical patients?
Relative Risk: 3.9 (95% CI 2.4–6.5)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.7% vs 3.1%
p-value: p=<0.001
The likelihood of preoperative consultation varies significantly across surgical specialties, with most consultations provided to patients with low comorbidity and low or intermediate surgical risk.
Variation in preoperative consultations by specialty, often among low-risk patients, should not yet change practice; leaves open optimal targeting and value.
BACKGROUND: Surgical patients are sometimes referred for preoperative evaluations by consultants in other medical specialties, although consultations are unnecessary for many patients, particularly for healthy patients undergoing low-risk surgeries. Surgical specialty has been shown to predict usage of preoperative consultations. However, evidence is generally limited regarding factors associated with preoperative consultations. This study evaluates surgical specialty and other predictors of preoperative consultations. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed surgery claims of 7400 privately insured patients in Washington, United States, from eight surgical specialties. We estimated log-Poisson generalized estimating equation models that regress whether a patient received a consultation on surgical specialty and covariates accounting for the data's hierarchical structure with patients nesting within surgeons, and surgeons nesting within provider organizations. Covariates include age, gender, Deyo comorbidity index, surgical risk, and geographic factors. RESULTS: Overall, 485 (6.6%) patients had a preoperative consultation. The incidence of preoperative consultation varied significantly by surgical specialty. Orthopedics, neurosurgery, and ophthalmology had 3.9 (95% CI 2.4, 6.5), 2.3 (95% CI 1.1, 4.5), and 2.3 (95% CI 1.1, 4.6) times greater adjusted likelihoods of preoperative consultation than general surgery, respectively. The adjusted likelihoods of consultation for gynecology, urology, otolaryngology, and vascular surgery were not statistically different from general surgery. The following covariates were associated with greater likelihood of preoperative consultation: greater age, higher surgical risk, having one or more comorbidities vs. none, and small rural towns vs. urban areas. More than 75% of all consultations were provided to patients with a Deyo comorbidity index of 0 or 1. Low surgical risk patients had 0.3 (95% CI 0.3, 0.5) times the likelihood of preoperative consultation of intermediate and high-risk patients overall. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of preoperative consultation varied fourfold (an absolute 9% points) across surgical specialties. Most consultations were provided to patients with low comorbidity and with low or intermediate surgical risk. To improve usage of preoperative consultations as an evidence-based practice, future research should determine how the health outcomes effects of preoperative consultations vary depending on comorbidity burden and surgical risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thilen et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing common inpatient or outpatient surgical procedures (n=7,400). Surgical specialty (Orthopedics) vs. General surgery was evaluated on Preoperative medical consultation within the 42-day preoperative period (RR 3.9, 95% CI 2.4, 6.5, p=<0.001). Orthopedics, neurosurgery, and ophthalmology were associated with 3.9, 2.3, and 2.3 times greater adjusted likelihoods of preoperative medical consultation compared to general surgery, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: