Not every first footstep on a virgin shore leaves enduring trace, nor every first human settlement an enduring deposit that chances to survive, and then chances to be observed archaeologically. Good environmental evidence from Mangaia Island, central East Polynesia, gives — it is contended — a fairer picture of the human invasion of remote Oceania than the short and sceptical chronology recently published in ANTIQUITY.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kirch et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: