Human coronary artery branching closely approximates theoretical physiological optimums, more so than in rat models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Human data better approximate coronary branching optimality than rat models; leaves open species-specific validation for hemodynamic research.
Branching angles and branch diameters were measured in a total of 850 arterial junctions in the coronary networks of two human hearts. Comparison is made with similar data obtained previously from the coronary networks of rats, and with what is considered to be optimum on theoretical grounds. It is concluded that the branching characteristics of the human coronary arteries are closer to the theoretical optimum than those of the coronary networks of rats. While the human data exhibit some departure from optimality and a good amount of scatter, these are well within levels observed elsewhere in the cardiovascular systems of man and animals, and considerably better than those found in the coronary networks of rats. The departure from optimality, in terms of physiological cost to the system, is within 5% for most data points.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zamir et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: