Key result
Atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.03-2.07), and statin therapy failed to improve prognosis or attenuate the adverse effects of AF.
Why the study?
The joint association of atrial fibrillation and statin therapy with adverse outcomes in heart failure patients treated with CRT has not been fully investigated.
Does statin therapy improve outcomes or attenuate the adverse effects of atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Cohort (n=685)
Does statin therapy improve outcomes or attenuate the adverse effects of atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy?
In heart failure patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy, atrial fibrillation is associated with worse clinical outcomes, and statin therapy does not mitigate this risk or improve overall prognosis.
AF may flag higher mortality risk among CRT recipients; leaves open whether statin use modifies outcomes.
Background: The joint association of atrial fibrillation (AF) and statin therapy with adverse outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has not been fully investigated so far. The purpose of this study was to explore the independent and joint association of AF and statin therapy with adverse outcomes. Methods: Study patients were divided into four groups according to AF status and statin use: Non-AF/Statin, Non-AF/Non-Statin, AF/Statin, and AF/Non-Statin. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the independent and joint association of AF and statin therapy with poor prognosis. Results: Among 685 CRT patients, there were 180 deaths (26.5%) and 198 HF hospitalization (29.6%) during the 14 years of follow-up. AF was associated with a 46% increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.03-2.07) and a 59% increased risk of HF hospitalization (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.16-2.20) than those without AF. However, statin therapy failed to improve the prognosis. In the joint analysis, compared with the Non-AF/Statin group, the AF/Non-Statin group suffered a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.04-2.93) and HF hospitalization (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.08-2.86). Furthermore, adding AF to the traditional risk factor model significantly improved the predictive value for death (C-statistic from 0.654 to 0.691) and HF (C-statistic from 0.613 to 0.675). Conclusion: AF was associated with poor prognosis, and statin use failed to improve the prognosis. Further analysis showed that statin therapy is ineffective in improving prognosis and fails to attenuate the adverse effects of AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Heart failure treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=685). Atrial fibrillation and statin therapy vs. Absence of atrial fibrillation and/or statin use was evaluated on all-cause mortality (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.03-2.07). Atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.03-2.07), and statin therapy failed to improve prognosis or attenuate the adverse effects of AF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: