Key result
A multiplex one-step RT real-time PCR detected 10% more Rotavirus and 23% more Norovirus genogroup II positive samples than enzyme immunoassay in patients with diarrhea.
Why the study?
Does multiplex RT real-time PCR improve the detection and quantification of Rotavirus and Norovirus in stool samples compared to EIA?
Cross-Sectional (n=188)
Does multiplex RT real-time PCR improve the detection and quantification of Rotavirus and Norovirus in stool samples compared to EIA?
A newly developed multiplex RT real-time PCR offers greater sensitivity and utility for detecting and quantifying Rotavirus and Norovirus compared to commercial EIA kits.
May support multiplex RT-PCR for higher viral detection in diarrhea; leaves open prospective outcome studies before routine adoption.
Rotavirus (RoV) and Norovirus (NoV) are the main causes of viral gastroenteritis. Currently, there is no validated multiplex real-time PCR that can detect and quantify RoV and NoV simultaneously. The aim of the study was to develop, validate, and internally control a multiplex one-step RT real-time PCR to detect and quantify RoV and NoV in stool samples. PCR sensitivity was assessed by comparing amplification against the current gold standard, enzyme immunoassay (EIA), on stool samples from 94 individuals with diarrhea and 94 individuals without diarrhea. PCR detected 10% more RoV positive samples than EIA in stools samples from patients with diarrhea. PCR detected 23% more NoV genogroup II positive samples from individuals with diarrhea and 9% more from individuals without diarrhea than EIA, respectively. Genotyping of the PCR positive/EIA negative samples suggested the higher rate of PCR positivity, in comparison to EIA, was due to increased sensitivity, rather than nonspecific hybridization. Quantitation demonstrated that the viral loads of RoV and NoV in the stools of diarrheal patients were an order of magnitude greater than in individuals without diarrhea. This internally controlled real-time PCR method is robust, exhibits a high degree of reproducibility, and may have a greater utility and sensitivity than commercial EIA kits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dung et al. (2012) conducted a cross-sectional in viral gastroenteritis (n=188). multiplex one-step RT real-time PCR vs. enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was evaluated on detection of Rotavirus A and Norovirus. A multiplex one-step RT real-time PCR detected 10% more Rotavirus and 23% more Norovirus genogroup II positive samples than enzyme immunoassay in patients with diarrhea.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: