Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: We conducted a prospective, double-blind study todetermine whether a difficult endotracheal intubation could be predicted preoperatively by a simple new technique, theupper lip bite test and compared it with three other tests used for prediction of difficult intubation: Modified Mallampaticriteria (MMC), Thyromental distance (TM) and Mouth opening (MO). Materials and Methods: Five hundred patients,aged above 16 years, and presenting for elective surgery were subjected to the following assessments: (1) Upper lipbite test (ULBT), class I: lower incisors can bite the upper lip above the vermilion line; class II: lower incisors can bitethe upper lip below the vermilion line; class III: lower incisors cannot bite the upper lip; (2) Oropharyngeal classaccording to the MMC. (3) The distance between the chin and thyroid cartilage (thyromental distance). (4) Extend ofmaximum mouth opening test. Results: ULBT had significantly higher accuracy (96%) and specificity (98.3%) and thelowest rate of false positive (p< 0.001). The most sensitive test was the TM test (42%). Conclusion: We concludedthat comparison of the three tests, UPBT has sufficient value in predicting difficult intubation in adults
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chohedri et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: