Key result
PH-targeted medical therapies have evolved to require prospective operability adjudication and sufficient study duration, with riociguat demonstrating a 46-meter improvement in 6-minute walk distance for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
Why the study?
Although pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for CTEPH, many patients have inoperable disease or persistent/recurrent PH after surgery, necessitating alternative options including targeted medical therapy.
Does pulmonary hypertension-targeted medical therapy improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
Does pulmonary hypertension-targeted medical therapy improve clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in patients with inoperable or persistent/recurrent chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
This review outlines the evolution of clinical trials for CTEPH, emphasizing that dedicated trial designs with prospective operability adjudication are essential for evaluating medical and multimodality therapies.
Supports targeted therapy in inoperable CTEPH; leaves open optimal trial designs for multimodality evaluation.
Although pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), many patients have inoperable disease, and some have persistent or recurrent pulmonary hypertension (PH) after surgery. Alternative options (balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and PH-targeted medical therapy) are, therefore, required. Studies of medical therapies for CTEPH have evolved since Aerosolized Iloprost Randomized (AIR), the first randomized, controlled study of a PH-targeted therapy (inhaled iloprost) to include patients with CTEPH. Key learnings from these studies include the need to evaluate CTEPH separately from other types of PH, the importance of prospective operability adjudication as part of the protocol, and the need for sufficient duration to allow treatment benefits to become apparent. The 16-week Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Soluble Guanylate Cyclase-Stimulator Study 1 (CHEST-1) study was the first to operationalize these learnings, demonstrating a significant mean improvement in 6-minute walk distance (+46 m) and improvements in hemodynamic endpoints with riociguat versus placebo. Findings from previous studies will inform the design of future studies to address key issues related to combination medical therapy. Data on combinations of macitentan with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors or oral prostanoids are available from MERIT, the first study to allow such regimens. No data on combinations including riociguat, the only licensed medical therapy for CTEPH, are available. Studies are also needed for multimodality treatment, including medical therapy plus BPA, and medical therapy as a bridge to PEA in selected operable patients. To address these issues and improve patient outcomes, it is vital that we learn from current studies to improve future trial design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2021) conducted a review in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. PH-targeted medical therapy vs. Placebo was evaluated. PH-targeted medical therapies have evolved to require prospective operability adjudication and sufficient study duration, with riociguat demonstrating a 46-meter improvement in 6-minute walk distance for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: