This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objectives: The study aimed to investigate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics as well as the therapeutic results in patients with locoregional (LR) relapse after treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with local and/or regional recurrent NPC over 13 years (2003-2015). Results: Twenty-five patients were treated for local or/and local–regional recurrence of NPC. The rate of LR relapse was 7.2%. The mean age of the patients was 46 ± 13.9 years. The median time to relapse was 25 months. The recurrence was nasopharyngeal in 17 patients, nasopharyngeal and neck lymph nodes in 7 patients, and neck lymph nodes in 1 patient. Fifteen relapsed patients had a locally advanced disease (rT3-rT4). Patients who had initially T1 or T2 tumor had a locally advanced relapsed disease (rT3rT4) in 27.3% and patients whose disease was initially classified as T3 or T4 had a locally advanced relapsed disease (rT3T4) in 85.7% ( P = .005, Fisher test). Twelve patients had chemotherapy after relapse. Chemotherapy was followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in 3 patients and by radiotherapy (RT) in 4 patients. Nine patients had concurrent chemoradiotherapy and 1 patient had exclusive RT. The overall survival (OS) at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years was, respectively, 58%, 18%, and 10%. The OS was significantly higher in patients with good performance status at the time of relapse (World Health Organization = 1; P = .01) and in patients with late relapse (after 2 years; P = .03). Conclusions: Locoregional relapse rate in our study was 7.2%. Locoregional reirradiation was the mainstay treatment modality in relapsed NPC. Relapsed NPC had a poor prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of 18%. The OS was significantly higher in patients with good performance status and in patients with late relapse (after 2 years).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toumi et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: