Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: Assessment of kidney function is essential in the management and follow-up of children with cancer. However, the best method to assess the kidney function in children with cancer is unknown.Methods: The study compared glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using various methods. Four methods for determining GFR are as follows: technetium-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid clearance (mGFR), serum creatinine (sCr)-based equations (eGFR- Schwartz and eGFR-Pottel), cystatin C (CysC)-based equations (eGFR-Zappitelli1 and eGFR-CKiD1), and combined sCr-CysCbased equations (eGFR-Zappitelli2 and eGFR-CKiD2).Results: A total of 54 pediatric patients diagnosed with cancer were evaluated. The estimated GFR (eGFR) equations showed moderately correlated with mGFR, with eGFR-Zappitelli2 showing the highest correlation (r=0.639, P<0.001). The GFR-Schwartz and eGFR-Pottel equations had mean biases of –5.72 mL/min/1.73 m2 and –6.64 mL/min/1.73 m2, with 20.4% and 57.4% of values within 10% and 30% of mGFR for GFR-Schwartz, and 20.4% and 48.1% for eGFR-Pottel, respectively. The CysC-based eGFR showed significant bias with mean bias of –30.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 for eGFR-Zappitelli1 and –53.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 for eGFR-CKiD1. The combined sCr-CysC-based equations of eGFR-Zappitelli2 had a mean bias of –1.32 mL/min/1.73 m2, with 16.7% of values within 10% accuracy and 57.4% within 30% accuracy. The eGFR-CKiD2 had a mean bias of –34.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 and the best accuracy, with 27.8% and 59.3% of values falling within 10% and 30%, respectively.Conclusions: Among the methods evaluated, the combined sCr-CysC-based eGFR showed better accuracy with mGFR compared with the other equations in children with cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kook et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: