Key result
Diabetes mellitus was associated with a significantly higher 1-year rate of stent thrombosis compared to nondiabetics (1.7% vs. 0.7%) following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation, an effect primarily driven by insulin-treated patients.
Why the study?
Does diabetes mellitus, particularly insulin-treated diabetes, increase the risk of MACE, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding at 1 year after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation?
Observational (n=15,147)
Yes
Does diabetes mellitus, particularly insulin-treated diabetes, increase the risk of MACE, stent thrombosis, and major bleeding at 1 year after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.7% vs 0.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
Diabetic patients, especially those requiring insulin, face significantly higher risks of MACE and stent thrombosis at 1 year after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation compared to non-diabetics.
Heightened stent thrombosis vigilance may be prudent in insulin-treated diabetics post-sirolimus-eluting stents; leaves open whether tailored antithrombotic regimens improve outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus has worse outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention. AIM: We assessed stent thrombosis (ST), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and major bleeding rates at 1 year after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients with diabetes mellitus in a large multicenter registry. METHODS: From May 2006 to April 2008, 15,147 unselected consecutive patients were enrolled at 320 centers in 56 countries in a prospective, observational registry after implantation of ≥ 1 SES. Source data were verified in 20% randomly chosen patients at > 100 sites. Adverse events were adjudicated by an independent Clinical Event Committee. RESULTS: Complete follow-up at 1 year was obtained in 13,693 (92%) patients, 4,577 (30%) of whom were diabetics. Within diabetics, 1,238 (9%) were insulin-treated diabetics (ITD). Diabetics were older (64 vs. 62 years, P < 0.001), with higher incidence of major coronary risk factors, co-morbidities, and triple-vessel coronary artery disease. Coronary lesions had smaller reference vessel diameter (2.88 ± 0.46 vs. 2.93 ± 0.45 mm, P < 0.001) and were more often heavily calcified (26.1% vs. 22.6%, P < 0.001). At 1 year, diabetics had higher MACE rate (6.8% vs. 3.9%, P < 0.001) driven by ITD (10.6% vs. 5.5%, P < 0.001). Finally, diabetics had significant increase in ST (1.7% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001), principally owing to ITD (3.4% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001). There was an overall low risk of major bleeding during follow-up, without significant difference among subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In the e-SELECT registry, diabetics represented 30% of patients undergoing SES implantation and had significantly more co-morbidities and complex coronary lesions. Although 1-year follow-up documented good overall outcome in diabetics, higher ST and MACE rates were observed, mainly driven by ITD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bartorelli et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=15,147). Diabetes mellitus vs. Nondiabetics was evaluated on Definite and probable stent thrombosis at 1 year (p=<0.001). Diabetes mellitus was associated with a significantly higher 1-year rate of stent thrombosis compared to nondiabetics (1.7% vs. 0.7%) following sirolimus-eluting stent implantation, an effect primarily driven by insulin-treated patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: