Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To implement a short-duration magnetization preparation sequence, which consists of a saturation followed by multiple inversion pulses, for imaging of short-T1 species and suppression of long-T1 species. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computer optimizations were performed to derive preparation schemes that 1) suppress long-T1 background species with T1>or=250 msec, 2) maximize the MZ of contrast-enhanced (CE) structures with T1<or=50 msec, and 3) have a preparation duration in the range of 200 msec. The optimized sequences were tested on a phantom and a pig model instrumented with an intracoronary catheter for infusion of contrast media. RESULTS: Computer simulations generated preparation schemes with durations of 165-225 msec depending on the number of preparation pulses used, which generated saturation of over 98% for T1>250 msec, and about a 30% reduction for 20 msec<T1<50 msec. The phantom studies validated the performance of the optimized sequences. Coronary artery angiograms (380 msec for preparation and image acquisition) demonstrated signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) in the range of 13-15.5 and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) in the range of 6.3-7.1 in the CE coronary vessels. CONCLUSION: This work demonstrates that fast magnetization-driven preparation schemes can be implemented for fast imaging of CE coronary vessels with efficient saturation of background species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gui et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: