Key result
Cardiologist-guided lipid-lowering therapy improved expected LDL-C levels by a mean of 9.0 mg/dl, but the <100 mg/dl target was only reached in 51.3% (95% CI 50.0-52.5) of the total cohort.
Why the study?
What is the rate of guideline-recommended LDL-C target achievement in high-risk patients on chronic statin therapy in ambulatory clinical practice?
Observational (n=6,711)
Yes
What is the rate of guideline-recommended LDL-C target achievement in high-risk patients on chronic statin therapy in ambulatory clinical practice?
Despite improvements in lipid-lowering therapy by cardiologists, nearly half of high-risk patients in ambulatory care still fail to reach the guideline-recommended LDL-C target of <100 mg/dl.
Suboptimal LDL-C target achievement persists despite cardiologist guidance; leaves open whether intensified strategies can close the gap in ambulatory high-risk patients.
BACKGROUND: Lipid-lowering treatment has been proven to decrease the rate of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with manifest coronary artery disease (CAD) or CAD equivalent risk profile. Current treatment guidelines recommend low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) less than 100 mg/dl (optional <70 mg/dl) as the target level for this high-risk population. Little is known about the ambulatory treatment of high-risk patients in clinical practice and the achievement of guideline recommended target values. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the '2L cardio' registry in Germany, 295 cardiologists enrolled 6711 consecutive patients with known CAD, and/or diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease (summarized as 'coronary risk equivalent', CE), on chronic statin treatment. They recorded actual LDL-C values at entry, probable changes in therapy, and the expected LDL-C values using a lipid calculator based on an earlier observational study in a similar setting. The three groups comprised 2618 patients with CAD plus CE (39.0%; median LDL-C 112 mg/dl), 3436 patients with CAD only (51.2%; median LDL-C 108 mg/dl), and 657 with CE only (9.8%; median LDL-C 124 mg/dl). They had LDL-C levels less than 100 mg/dl in 36.2% [95% confidence intervals (CI): 34.3-38.1], 39.7% (CI: 38.0-41.4), and 27.2% (CI: 23.7-30.7), respectively. Statin doses at entry were usually in the lower to intermediate range (e.g. simvastatin median 25 mg/day). Cardiologists switched to another statin in 10.1% (9.4-10.8), increased the dose of statins (if same drug) in 22.2% (CI: 21.1-23.2) and/or added a cholesterol absorption inhibitor in 23.7% (CI: 22.7-24.7) of the patients. The cardiologists' intervention improved expected LDL-C levels in the total cohort by a mean of 9.0 mg/dl, but the 100 mg/dl LDL-C target was only reached in 51.3% (CI: 50.0-52.5) of the total cohort. CE patients appeared undertreated in terms of antiplatelet drugs. DISCUSSION: Through infrequent increases in statin doses and mainly through add-on of a cholesterol absorption inhibitor, cardiologists improved target level attainment. Compared with earlier studies in the outpatient setting, the treatment to target for LDL-C of high-risk CAD patients has improved, but is not satisfactory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gitt et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease or coronary risk equivalent (n=6,711). Cardiologist-guided lipid-lowering therapy was evaluated on Expected achievement of LDL-C target <100 mg/dl (95% CI 50.0-52.5). Cardiologist-guided lipid-lowering therapy improved expected LDL-C levels by a mean of 9.0 mg/dl, but the <100 mg/dl target was only reached in 51.3% (95% CI 50.0-52.5) of the total cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: