Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A previously described pig insulin (PI)-specific T cell line of (B10 X B10.BR)F1 origin was assayed for its reactivity with species variants of insulin in the presence of antigen-presenting cells (APC) of various H-2 haplotypes. In addition to its reactivity with PI and bovine insulin (BI) in the context of syngeneic F1 (H-2b X k)-APC, a weak cross-reactivity was observed with parental B10 (H-2b)-APC and BI but not PI. The cross-reactive cells could be selected out by several restimulations with the combination of BI and B10-APC. From the resulting, strongly cross-reactive T cell line several interleukin 2-dependent sublines were developed which did not require antigen-specific restimulations for further propagation. All such sublines had retained the original cross-reactivity with BI and B10-APC but showed significant differences in their fine specificity patterns, which indicates that each subline represents a clonal population. One of the sublines was cloned by limiting dilution at one cell/culture with a cloning efficiency of 76%. Five of the clones that were tested for reactivity had the same cross-reactivity as the original subline and upon recloning at 0.1 cells/culture the pattern again remained unchanged. From an analysis of the two antigen combinations (PI/F1 and BI/B10) it can be concluded that single cells can react with different restriction elements in the context of distinct epitopes of insulin. The implications of this finding for the mechanism of T cell recognition are discussed and a model for the function of major histocompatibility complex molecules in T cell recognition is proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spaeth et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: