This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Using two measurement methods, pulse-echo ultrasound and resonance ultrasound spectroscopy, we measured the elastic constants of both monocrystal and polycrystal osmium between 5 and 300 K. Our measurements help to resolve the current measurement-and-theory controversy concerning whether osmium's bulk modulus exceeds diamond's. It does not at any temperature (for osmium, we find a zero-temperature bulk modulus of 410 GPa and a 300 K value of 405 GPa, while diamond's value being 442 GPa). From the zero-temperature elastic constants, we extract a Debye temperature of 477 K. From Gr\"uneisen's first rule, we extract a Gr\"uneisen parameter of 2.1, agreeing well with handbook values. Osmium shows near elastic anisotropy and small elastic constant changes with temperature (for example, the bulk modulus increases only about 1.2% upon cooling through the studied temperature interval). In all cases, the Cᵢⱼ(T) measurements agree well with an Einstein-oscillator model. We consider especially the Poisson ratio, which is low and anisotropic (ν₁₂=0.242, ν₁₃=0.196) and suggests some covalent interatomic bonding, which may account for osmium's extreme high hardness and the departure of the $5d$ elements from Friedel's parabolic bulk-modulus/atomic-number model.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pantea et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: