Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Third-party-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL), or veto CTL, are being assessed as a cellular therapeutic for the induction of T-cell tolerance during transplantation. Conceptually, veto cell-expressed antigens (Ags) may induce B-cell immune responses, and this may have deleterious consequences. Whether veto cells induce immunity, tolerance, or are ignored by B lymphocytes has, however, not been addressed. METHODS: CTL were retrovirally transduced with a model cell surface Ag to generate veto CTL. The impact of CTL-specific Ag expression on the activation and tolerization of Ag-specific B cells was assessed in vitro and, using adoptive transfer models, in vivo. RESULTS: In vitro, CTL-expressed Ag induced an abortive proliferative response in specific B lymphocytes, whereby an initial proliferative burst was followed by cell death. In vivo, the administration of veto CTL also induced B-cell tolerance. Specific immunoglobulin was not detected after subsequent immunization with a veto cell-expressed Ag. Modeling of this effect with Ag-specific B-cell receptor transgenic B lymphocytes demonstrated that Ag-specific B cells were eliminated by the veto CTL; the cell division was accompanied by the exhaustion and depletion of responding cells. Veto-induced B-cell tolerance could be wholly abrogated by treatment with the toll-like receptor ligand lipopolysaccharide, implying that this tolerance resulted from the absence of adequate supplemental signals during antigenic stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Veto CTL are effective promoters of B-cell tolerance. Further assessment of their therapeutic potential in this regard is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: