Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two uranyl Schiff-base coordination complexes, UO 2 L(MeOH) and UO 2 Cl 2 ( H 2 L ) {L = N, N ′-bis[(4,4′-diethylamino)salicylidene]-1,2-phenylenediamine}, have been synthesized that feature a rigid phenyl backbone. These complexes have been characterized by structural, spectroscopic, and theoretical analysis to offer an electronic structure basis to explain the bonding parameters and stability. Single-crystal X-ray analysis reveals that UO 2 L(MeOH) adopts the typical “soft taco confirmation” characteristic of uranyl salophen complexes, whereas UO 2 Cl 2 ( H 2 L ) features an unusual neutral ligand coordination that contains an internal hydrogen bond between the phenol and imine. Rate constants calculated from electrochemical experiments confirm a quasi-reversible UO 2 2+ /UO 2 + couple. Single-configurational and multiconfigurational methods were used to explore the bonding in UO 2 L(MeOH) and UO 2 Cl 2 ( H 2 L ) . For UO 2 Cl 2 ( H 2 L ), the U–Cl bond exhibits more covalent contributions than U–O L .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klamm et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: