This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate transfer learning combined with various convolutional neural networks (TL-CNNs) in predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 ( IDH1 ) status of grade II/III gliomas. METHODS: Grade II/III glioma patients diagnosed at the Tangdu Hospital (August 2009 to May 2017) were retrospectively enrolled, including 54 patients with IDH1 mutant and 56 patients with wild-type IDH1 . Convolutional neural networks, AlexNet, GoogLeNet, ResNet, and VGGNet were fine-tuned with T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1CE) images. The single-modal networks were integrated with averaged sigmoid probabilities, logistic regression, and support vector machine. FLAIR-T1CE-fusion (FC-fusion), T2WI-T1CE-fusion (TC-fusion), and FLAIR-T2WI-T1CE-fusion (FTC-fusion) were used for fine-tuning TL-CNNs. RESULTS: IDH1 -mutant prediction accuracies using AlexNet, GoogLeNet, ResNet, and VGGNet achieved 70.0% (AUC = 0.660), 65.0% (AUC = 0.600), 70.0% (AUC = 0.700), and 80.0% (AUC = 0.730) for T2WI images, 70.0% (AUC = 0.660), 70.0% (AUC = 0.620), 70.0% (AUC = 0.710), and 80.0% (AUC = 0.720) for FLAIR images, and 73.7% (AUC = 0.744), 73.7% (AUC = 0.656), 73.7% (AUC = 0.633), and 73.7% (AUC = 0.700) for T1CE images, respectively. The highest AUC (0.800) was achieved using VGGNet and FC-fusion images. CONCLUSIONS: TL-CNNs (especially VGGNet) had a potential predictive value for IDH1 -mutant status of grade II/III gliomas.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: