Why the study?
Double superior vena cava can cause technical difficulties during cardiovascular procedures, but quantitative data describing its morphological features were lacking.
CT imaging allows for detailed anatomical classification and quantitative measurement of double superior vena cava, which may help minimize risks during cardiovascular procedures.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CT classification shows type I predominance and larger coronary sinus in types I/II; leaves open procedural risk implications for double superior vena cava.
BACKGROUND: A double superior vena cava (DSVC) may cause technical difficulties in some cardiovascular procedures. However, no quantitative data exist to describe the morphological features of this anomaly. METHODS: From January 2015 to January 2019, the data of 128 consecutive patients diagnosed with DSVC on computed tomography (CT) images were retrospectively analyzed. We proposed an easy and rational method for DSVC classification based on the presence or absence of the left brachiocephalic vein (LBCV), the presence or absence of an anastomotic vein bridging the bilateral superior vena cava (SVC), and the drainage pattern of the left superior vena cava (LSVC). The following classifications were established: type I, LBVC absent, LSVC drainage into the right atrium via the coronary sinus; type II, LBCV present, LSVC drainage into the right atrium via the coronary sinus; type III, LBCV absent, LSVC drainage into the right atrium via the anastomosis; type IV, LBCV present, LSVC drainage into the right atrium via the anastomosis. The length, diameter, and area of the bilateral SVC and the coronary sinus were carefully measured across the 4 types. RESULTS: Type I was the most frequently occurring type (66 of 128, 51.6%), followed by type II (43 of 128, 33.6%), then type III (15 of 128, 11.7%), and type IV (4 of 128, 3.1%). The LSVC was significantly longer than the right SVC (RSVC) in all 4 types, and the diameters of the LSVC were significantly larger in types without the LBCV (i.e., types I and III) (P<0.0001 for all). Additionally, the diameter of the coronary sinus in types I and II was triple that in types III and IV (P<0.0001), which was thought to be due to increased venous blood reflux through the coronary sinus. CONCLUSIONS: The anatomical features of DSVC can be satisfactorily depicted on CT. The quantitative measurement of this anomaly by the reporting radiologists could assist clinicians to minimize the procedure-associated risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: