The main difference between the simple RRK theory and the better based but more complex RRKM theory is explained. Starting from the premise that the classical versus quantum mechanical estimation of the density of states is the major source of the difference, earlier attempts to incorporate the quantum effects in an effective value for the number of oscillators s are noted. By examining the expression for the RRKM rate coefficient it is found that a single effective s value will generally not suffice, but a much better representation of the quantum effects can be obtained if it is recognized that the problem inherently contains two different effective s values. A theory based on this analysis is constructed. It reproduces RRKM results to much improved accuracy, removing difficulties found earlier with single‐ s ‐value theories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schranz et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: