PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2007European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation

Development and validation of a very brief questionnaire measure of physical activity in adults with coronary heart disease

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

Is the Total Activity Measure questionnaire accurate and reliable for assessing physical activity in adults with coronary heart disease compared to accelerometer data?

Population

73 adults (58 men, 15 women) aged 47-84 years with coronary heart disease

Comparison

Total Activity Measure 1 and 2 questionnaires… vs 7-day RT3 accelerometer data

Design

Cross-sectional

Follow-up

7 days

Authors

AOAlison OrrellPDPatrick DohertyJMJeremy N. V. Miles

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Supports TAM2 for activity assessment in CHD; extends validation data but leaves outcome prediction open.

Structured PICO

Is the Total Activity Measure questionnaire accurate and reliable for assessing physical activity in adults with coronary heart disease compared to accelerometer data?

P
Population
73 adults (58 men, 15 women) aged 47-84 years with coronary heart disease
I
Intervention
Total Activity Measure (TAM) 1 and 2 questionnaires administered twice, 7 days apart
C
Comparator
7-day RT3 accelerometer data
O
Outcome
Questionnaire accuracy (test-retest reliability and concurrent validity compared with accelerometer)patient reported

The Total Activity Measure 2 is a reliable and reasonably accurate brief questionnaire for assessing total and moderate intensity physical activity in adult cardiac patients.

Cite This Study

Orrell et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a86547d169aec2a7f0f6d7fhttps://doi.org/10.1097/hjr.0b013e3280ecfd56
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share