PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 1991American Journal of Epidemiology33 citations

Validation of the Physical Activity Instrument for the Life in New Zealand National Survey

View Full Paper
WHWill G. HopkinsNWNoela WilsonDRDavid G. Russell

Key Points

  • The aim is to validate a physical activity recall instrument for self-administration among New Zealand adults.
  • Randomly selected 140 subjects from urban electoral rolls
  • Used bootstrapping to compare correlations between subjective and objective measures
  • Compared high intensity, low intensity, and total activity metabolism measures
  • High intensity measures correlated moderately (mean r = 0.39) with each other but poorly with metabolism and low intensity measures (r = 0.16, -0.02)
  • Objective measures correlated with high intensity measures (mean r = 0.25) but showed no correlation with metabolism or low intensity measures (mean r = 0.03, -0.07)
  • Activity measures from the instrument had mean correlations that equaled or surpassed those of the Stanford measures.

Abstract

A physical activity recall instrument suitable for self-administration by the adult New Zealand population was devised and validated for 140 subjects selected randomly from urban electoral rolls. Validation used bootstrapping to compare correlations between subjective measures derived from the instrument, the Stanford 7-day recall questionnaire and other questionnaires, and objective measures derived from an exercise test. Subjective measures were grouped as measures of high intensity activity, low intensity activity, or total activity metabolism. The high intensity measures correlated moderately with each other (mean r = 0.39), but poorly with metabolism and low intensity measures (r = 0.16, -0.02, respectively). The mean correlation between the metabolism and low intensity groups (r = 0.26) was similar to those within these groups (r = 0.31, 0.25, respectively). Thus, the high intensity measures formed a group distinct from the metabolism and low intensity groups, which represented similar measures. The objective measures that correlated with high intensity measures (mean r = 0.25) are predominantly recognized risk factors for cardiovascular disease; these did not correlate with the metabolism or low intensity measures (mean r = 0.03, -0.07, respectively). Activity measures from the instrument had mean correlations with subjective and objective measures that equaled or surpassed those of the Stanford measures from the same group. The authors conclude that 1) population health studies that assay physical activity should include well-defined measures of high intensity activity, and 2) valid measures of physical activity in the New Zealand population are achievable with this instrument.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hopkins et al. (1991) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1feb313224f8dacd0da2e3https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115805
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The New Zealand Physical Activity Questionnaires: Validation by Heart-Rate Monitoring in a Multiethnic Population2008 · 39 citations
  2. 2Development and validation of a very brief questionnaire measure of physical activity in adults with coronary heart disease2007 · 28 citations
  3. 3Reproducibility and Validity of a Self-Administered Physical Activity Questionnaire1994 · 1,050 citations
  4. 4Measuring Physical Activity in a Cardiac Rehabilitation Population Using a Smartphone-Based Questionnaire2013 · 49 citations
  5. 5What physical activity surveillance needs: validity of a single-item questionnaire2013 · 105 citations