Why the study?
Do beta-blockers cause adverse metabolic effects or mask hypoglycaemia in patients with diabetes mellitus?
Do beta-blockers cause adverse metabolic effects or mask hypoglycaemia in patients with diabetes mellitus?
Cardioselective beta-blockers are preferable for insulin-dependent diabetics and do not appear to mask hypoglycaemia or worsen metabolic control.
Supports cardioselective beta-blockers in diabetes without hypoglycemia masking; leaves open prospective RCTs for confirmation.
The use of beta-blockers in diabetes mellitus has largely been restricted because of the reported adverse effects. Clinical investigations aimed at elucidating the possible reactions associated with the use of beta-blockers have disclosed no evidence of masking or signs or insulin-induced hypoglycaemia or potentiation of the insulin effect. Prolonged hypoglycaemia may develop, however, as a result of physical effort. There is no proof that during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia the concentrations of counter-regulatory hormones are depressed, but that of glycerol, a gluconeogenic precursor, is slightly diminished. Intensification of the hypertensive reaction during hypoglycaemia is less likely to occur during treatment with beta-selective blockers. In insulin-dependent diabetics receiving beta 1-blockers there is no evidence of any change - either deterioration or improvement - in metabolic control. In one small controlled trial there was no sign of impairment of the peripheral arterial circulation over a short period of administration of a non-selective beta-blocker. In general, for patients suffering from insulin-dependent diabetes, cardioselective agents are preferable. Since cardioselectivity is a dose-dependent property, reasonable caution should also be observed when using this type of drug in diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jan Östman (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: