Why the study?
The changing nature of the cardiology profession and the changing environment of healthcare necessitated an update reflecting contemporary and emerging requirements for practice and training needs.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Curriculum guideline document
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sets new standards for cardiology training programs; extends prior ESC curricula with updated Entrustable Professional Activities.
Cardiology, University Heart Center Zürich, Rämistrasse 100, Zürich, CH-8091, Switzerland; Retired Cardiologist, Manchester, UK; Consultant Cardiologist, Imperial College, London, UK; Department of Cardiology, Coimbra University Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal; Physician Cardiologist, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland; 2nd Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Greece; Clinical Cardiologist, Département de pathologie Cardiovasculaire, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium; Consultant Cardiologist and Intensivist, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK; Chef de Service, Service de Cardiologie, Hopital Louis Pradel, Bron, France; Consultant Cardiologist, Barts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, UK; Consultant Cardiologist, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; University of Birmingham Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Birmingham, UK; and Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistraße 52, Gebäude Ost 70, Hamburg, 20246, Germany
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanner et al. (2020) studied this question. The provided text is an author affiliation list for the ESC Core Curriculum for the Cardiologist and contains no clinical study data or findings.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: