Why the study?
Are specialist nurse-led rapid-access chest pain clinics safe and effective for assessing suspected new-onset angina?
Are specialist nurse-led rapid-access chest pain clinics safe and effective for assessing suspected new-onset angina?
Specialist nurse-led rapid-access chest pain clinics are effective in meeting assessment targets and identifying patients with coronary artery disease requiring intervention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports nurse-led rapid-access clinics meeting assessment targets; extends Level 3 evidence but randomized trials needed before practice change.
Objective: Rapid-access chest pain clinics, typically run by doctors, allow the rapid assessment of suspected new-onset angina. Five years ago specialist nurse-led rapid-access chest pain clinics were established at Royal Albert Edward Infirmary. The objective of this audit was to assess safety and effectiveness of these clinics. Method: Retrospective data were collected from all patients from January 2002 to December 2006. Results: GPs referred 1464 patients. Of those, 1349 (92.14%) patients were seen within the 14-day government target. The clinic had 1417 (96.8%) patients who under went exercise testing and 234 (16%) of these were positive. Of those patients 143 (61.8%) under went cardiac catheterization. Coronary artery disease was found in 110 patients. Eighty one patients under went revascularization and 29 patients were treated medically. Conclusions: This audit demonstrates that specialist nurse–led rapid -access chest pain clinics are safe and effective. They identify patients who are more likely to have coronary artery disease, therefore allowing early medical/surgical intervention and reducing patient morbidity and mortality. The burden on doctors is reduced and government targets are met.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: