Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RATIONAL AND OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the feasibility of a contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic sequence for imaging the cervical arteries. METHODS: Ninety-eight consecutive patients underwent contrast MR angiography using a 3D sequence in the coronal plane, including both carotid and vertebral arteries. Gadolinium was injected at the beginning of the sequence. When the contrast was not optimal, a second injection was performed 5 to 10 minutes later. Qualitative assessment was performed for each arterial portion in a consensus manner by three radiologists who judged contrast enhancement, imaging coverage, and artifacts. RESULTS: A second injection was required in 11 patients, and two examinations were not assessable because of motion artifacts. Among the vessels analyzed, 19% were not assessable owing to the limited coverage in 11% and to the low contrast in 9%. Carotid bifurcations were assessable in 95%, whereas vertebral arteries were visualized from their origins to their intradural portions in only 82% of cases. A longitudinal signal-void artifact was found in the center of the arterial lumen of carotid arteries in six patients. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast MR angiography constitutes a promising tool to assess cervical arteries. Some limitations including spatial resolution, timing of injection, and imaging coverage should be overcome in the near future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leclerc et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: