Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Several in-situ, rapid thermal gate dielectrics, 6.5-nm thick, including RTO, RTCVD, and RPECVD were used to fabricate fully implanted 0.25-/spl mu/m NMOSFET's along with Furnace gate oxides. The device reliability was studied by both channel hot-carrier stress and Fowler-Nordheim electron injection. It was found that devices having RTO or RTCVD oxides have about the same hot-carrier resistance as Furnace ones, while RPECVD oxides, deposited directly on Si without a grown oxide interface, were more susceptible to shifts. Both RTCVD and RPECVD oxides have a lower Si-SiO/sub 2/ barrier height (2.7 eV); nevertheless, RTCVD oxides show enhanced resistance against interface-state generation, threshold voltage shifts, and charging during Fowler-Nordheim stressing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: