Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The examination of predictors of non-adherence in transplantation populations offers the potential to identify high-risk individuals and concomitantly generate effective adherence-promoting interventions. The present paper aggregated quantitative estimates of various correlates of treatment adherence in studies of pediatric transplantation. Seventeen studies and three classes of predictors of non-adherence, including demographic, psychosocial, and treatment-related predictors, were included in the current analyses. The weighted means effect sizes for the demographic factors were in the small to medium range (female gender mean d = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.32-0.38, n = 8; mean age d = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.52-0.58, n = 7), suggesting that older youth and males tended to display more non-adherence behaviors than younger youth and females, respectively. Several psychosocial factors exhibited large to very large relationships with non-adherence, in particular comorbid psychiatric conditions (mean d = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.66-1.42, n = 3) and child self-responsibility for medication (mean d = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.53-1.23, n = 3). Finally, prior treatment/grafts (mean d = 0.17, 95% CI = -0.15-0.49, n = 3) and donor source (mean d = 0.33, 95% CI = -0.10-0.76, n = 4) exhibited small, non-significant relationships with non-adherence. Limitations of the study are discussed as are future directions for research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kahana et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: