Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It has become customary to begin a discussion of the nature and present state of the discipline of international relations with a number of complaints. This article will not abandon the custom; indeed, its purpose is, in the first place, to state the conviction that many of the problems we face in our field can be solved only by far more systematic theoretical work than has been done in the past—a conviction shared by most writers. Secondly, however, I will try to show that recent approaches to a general theory of international relations are unsatisfactory, because each one is, in its own fashion, a short cut to knowledge—sometimes even a short cut to a destination that is anything but knowledge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stanley Hoffmann (1959) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: