Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Finite-control-set model predictive control (FCS-MPC) of multiphase (n-phase,nis assumed to be an odd number for simplicity) drives is challenging because of the large number of actual/virtual voltage vectors and the need for current control in (n-1)/2 sub-spaces (or planes; multi-plane current control). Any sub-optimal design (poor or no current control in some of the (n-1)/2 planes) may result in high individual plane current ripples, due to the low reactance. This work therefore investigates continuous-control-set (CCS) MPC for constant switching frequency multiphase motor drives as another alternative. The high-bandwidth CCS-MPC is designed to accurately account for system non-idealities, namely digital control and pulse width modulation delays, inverter dead time, and measurement noise. It will be shown that the CCS-MPC has the advantages of full voltage vector space access, regular switching characteristic, and improved cycle-by-cycle tracking control, while maintaining some of the known advantages of the FCS-MPC, e.g., intuitive cost function design, model-based control, and fast dynamics. The proposed control scheme is benchmarked experimentally against the classical, proportional-integral-based, field-oriented control in conjunction with an asymmetrical six-phase induction motor drive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: