Why the study?
Does the presence of fragmented QRS on surface EKG predict myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease, or long-term adverse outcomes in patients with known or suspected CAD?
Does the presence of fragmented QRS on surface EKG predict myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease, or long-term adverse outcomes in patients with known or suspected CAD?
Fragmented QRS on surface EKG does not reliably predict myocardial scar, significant coronary artery disease, or long-term adverse outcomes in patients with suspected or known CAD.
fQRS should not guide scar assessment or CAD risk stratification; leaves open its utility in larger prospective cohorts.
PURPOSE: Conflicting evidence remains regarding the value of fragmented QRS (fQRS) on surface electrocardiogram (EKG). We present the 5-year outcome of patients with fQRS on EKG and its correlation to SPECT and coronary angiography (CA). METHODS: We retrospectively studied EKG's in 248 consecutive patients undergoing SPECT and CA with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). The presence of fQRS or Q waves in two contiguous EKG leads was correlated with major coronary artery distributions on SPECT and cath. Patients with bundle-branch block, paced-rhythm or absence of EKG within one month of SPECT were excluded. The final EKG data for 238 patients were analyzed and compared with myocardial scar on SPECT and the presence of significant (>50%) coronary stenosis on CA. Predictors of MACE (death, MI, heart failure) were evaluated. Freedom from all-cause mortality was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Of 238 patients, no significant difference was noted in the presence of scar on SPECT in fQRS (3/77; 3.8%) versus no fQRS (11/161; 6.8%) (P=0.56); or CA based CAD (55/77; 71% fQRS) and no fQRS (99/161, 61.4%) (P=0.20). EKG Q wave presence was similar in both groups: (12/77; 15.5% fQRS), (17/161; 10.5% no fQRS) (P=0.3). Patients with CA based significant LAD disease were 3.680 times more likely to have fQRS (P=0.04), however, fQRS was not significantly associated with MACE (P=0.92) or all-cause mortality (P=0.93). CONCLUSIONS: This study does not support routine assessment of fQRS on surface EKG as a reliable predictor of SPECT myocardial scar, MACE or all-cause mortality over a long period of follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: