Why the study?
Heart failure remains prevalent worldwide despite guideline-directed medical therapies, prompting a summary of evidence for valsartan/sacubitril and its potential in HFpEF and hypertension.
Does sacubitril-valsartan reduce mortality and hospitalisation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
Does sacubitril-valsartan reduce mortality and hospitalisation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
This review highlights that sacubitril-valsartan significantly reduces mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in HFrEF patients and is an economical treatment option.
Guideline endorses expanded GDMT in HFrEF with elevated BNP; reinforces consensus for high-risk patients.
There are an estimated 17.9 million people worldwide who have heart failure, despite the widespread use of guideline-directed medical therapies such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), beta-adrenergic blockers, angiotensin receptor blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MCRAs) for chronic systolic HF for nearly two decades. In patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction, and an elevated circulating level of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide or BNP, valsartan/sacubitril significantly reduced mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure, as well as blood pressure. Numerous studies have shown that this new treatment is economical. Heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction receive valsartan/sacubitril in the form of a lower dosage and are closely monitored to ensure tolerance. We summarise the evidence for this treatment and highlight the potential for its use in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction as well as hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aakunuri et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: